韩愈幽兰操原文及注解（韩愈幽兰操原文及翻译）

原创 王春甲郭雨铭张喆 张喆博士团队

声明：本译文著作版权属于论文作者本人，张喆博士团队翻译和编辑整理后，只做公益分享，用于学习和交流，不做任何商业用途。如有侵害作者利益，请联系我们团队

zhangzhe0429@126.com，

我们商议处理或是删除等方式。特此向作者致敬，并代表全体读者表达真诚感谢。

论文译者：王春甲1 郭雨铭2 张喆3*

1.2 渤海大学教育科学学院心理健康教育硕士研究生在读。

3* 通信译者：张喆，男，渤海大学社会心理服务与艺术治疗中心主任，心理健康教育硕士生导师，韩国照片艺术治疗学会注册督导师；韩国圆光大学艺术治疗学博士。zhangzhe0429@126.com

本文相关疗法和技术：照片治疗，照片疗法，摄影治疗，影像治疗，艺术治疗，绘画治疗，绘本治疗，美术治疗，表达性艺术治疗，心理健康教育

开展针对残疾儿童的参与式摄影活动：一篇文献综述

Isabel Eisen a, Barbara Jane Cunningham b,c Wenonah Campbell b,c

a Bachelor of Health Sciences (Honours) Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;

b School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;

c CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

摘要

目的：本综述总结了使用对残疾儿童进行参与式摄影的研究，包括那些有沟通障碍的儿童，并描述了为促进他们参与定性研究而对该方法进行的修改。

方法：2016年秋季，我们搜索了Psycinfo(OVID)、ERIC、CINAHL和Webe，以确定对残疾儿童使用参与式摄影的研究。2018年1月，人们重复了搜索，以检索任何新的出版物。第一作者提取了描述每个研究的特征和所使用的修改的数据。

结果：在已确定的258篇文章中，有19篇符合纳入标准。参与者年龄在4-21岁之间，并有各种残疾。研究主题包括教育、休闲活动和成年期。研究人员对参与式摄影进行了修改，以提高可访问性：修改相机；提供个人培训；通过角色扮演教学同意；允许儿童指导成人拍照；包括其他形式的媒体；使用日记和问卷；提供简化问题的个人访谈；使用多种形式的交流；修改照片共享的分享方式。

结论：参与式摄影是研究残疾儿童，特别是那些有沟通障碍的儿童生活经历的有效方法。方法上的修改可以提高该人群对该方法的可及性。

对康复的影响

1.参与式摄影可能是一种有效的定性研究方法，以了解残疾儿童对广泛的主题的观点和经验。

2.研究人员可以使用许多具体的修改来支持将残疾儿童纳入参与式摄影研究。

3.使用参与式摄影方法的研究结果可能为康复专业人员提供对残疾儿童生活的重要见解。

参考文献

[1] Jones MM. An ethnographic exploration of narrative meth-

odologies to promote the voice of students with disabil-

ities. J Ethnogr Qual Res. 2007;2:32–40.

[2] Larivi?ere-Bastien D, Majnemer A, Shevell M, et al.

Perspectives of adolescents and young adults with cerebral

palsy on the ethical and social challenges encountered in

healthcare services. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2011;1:43–54.

[3] Wiart L. How can qualitative research contribute to the

expanding knowledge base in pediatric physical therapy?

Phys Ther Rev. 2012;17:425–429.

[4] Connelly LM. What is phenomenology? Medsurg Nurs.

2010;19:127–129.

[5] Carlsson E, Paterson BL, Scott-Findlay S, et al.

Methodological issues in interviews involving people with

communication impairments after acquired brain damage.

Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1361–1371.

[6] Dockrell JE, Lindsay G. Cognitive and linguistic factors in

the interview process. In: Roulstone S, McLeod S, editors.

Listening to children and young people with speech, lan-

guage and communication needs. Surrey (UK): J R Press

Ltd; 2011. p. 143–152.

[7] Ha VS, Whittaker A. ‘Closer to my world’: Children with aut-

ism spectrum disorder tell their stories through photovoice.

Glob Public Health. 2016;11:546–563.

[8] Lindsay S, Morales E, Yantzi N, et al. The experiences of par-

ticipating in winter among youths with a physical disability

compared with their typically developing peers. Child Care

Health Dev. 2015;41:980–988.

[9] Pinborough-Zimmerman J, Satterfield R, Miller J, et al.

Communication disorders: Prevalence and comorbid intel-

lectual disability, autism, and emotional/behavioral disor-

ders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16:359–367.

[10] Gillam R, Marquardt TP, Martin FN. Communication sciences

and disorders: from science to clinical practice. Burlington

(MA): Jones Bartlett; 2010.

[11] Lloyd V, Gatherer A, Kalsy S. Conducting qualitative inter-

view research with people with expressive language diffi-

culties. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:1386–1404.

[12] Sunderland LC. Speech, language, and audiology services in

public schools. Interv Sch Clin. 2004;39:209–217.

[13] Kirk S. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting

qualitative research with children and young people: a lit-

erature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:1250–1260.

[14] Ware J. Ascertaining the views of people with profound

and multiple learning disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil. 2004;

32:175–179.

[15] Goldbart J, Marshall J. Listening to proxies for children with

speech, language and communication needs. In: Roulstone

S, McLeod S, editors. Listening to children and young peo-

ple with speech, language and communication needs.

Surrey (UK): J R Press Ltd; 2011. p. 101–110.

[16] Mahon A, Glendinning C, Clarke K, et al. Researching chil-

dren: methods and ethics. Child Soc. 1996;10:145–154.

[17] Galloway H, Newman E. Is there a difference between child

self-ratings and parent proxy-ratings of the quality of life of

children with a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity

disorder (ADHD)? A systematic review of the literature.

Adhd Atten Def Hyp Disord. 2017;9:11–29.

[18] Owen R, Hayett L, Roulstone S. Children’s views of speech

and language therapy in school: Consulting children with

communication difficulties. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2004;

20:55–73.

[19] Batorowicz B, Campbell F, von Tetzchner S, et al. Social par-

ticipation of school-aged children who use communication

aids: the views of children and parents. Augment Altern

Commun. 2014;30:237–251.

[20] Harrington C, Foster M, Rodger S, et al. Engaging young

people with autism spectrum disorder in research inter-

views. Br J Learn Disabil. 2014;42:153–161.

[21] Al-Busaidi ZQ. Qualitative research and its uses in health

care. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2008;8:11

[22] Savin-Baden MS, Wimpenny K. Ethics in arts-related

research. In: Savin-Baden MS, Wimpenny K, editors. A prac-

tical guide to arts-related research. Rotterdam (The

Netherlands): Sense Publishers; 2014. p. 81–95.

[23] Cheak-Zamora NC, Teti M, Maurer-Batjer A, et al. Snapshots

of growing up: youth with autism explore adulthood

through photovoice. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016;37:433–441.

[24] Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory research methods: A

methodological approach in motion. Hist Soc Res. 2012;

37:191–222.

[25] Lal S, Jarus T, Suto MJ. A scoping review of the photovoice

method: Implications for occupational therapy research.

Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:181–190.

[26] Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and

use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav.

1997;24:369–387.

[27] Coad J, Hambly H. Listening to children with speech, lan-

guage and communication needs through arts-based meth-

ods. In: Roulstone S, McLeod S, editors. Listening to

children and young people with speech, language and

communication needs. Surrey (UK): J R Press Ltd; 2011.

p. 131–142.

[28] Carter B, Ford K. Researching children’s health experiences:

the place for participatory, child-centered, arts-based

approaches. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36:95–107.

[29] Holliday EL, Harrison LJ, McLeod S. Listening to children

with communication impairment talking through their

drawings. J Early Child Res. 2009;7:244–263.

[30] Obrusnikova I, Cavalier AR. Perceived barriers and facilita-

tors of participation in after-school physical activity by chil-

dren with autism spectrum disorders. J Dev Phys Disabil.

2011;23:195–211.

[31] Prins E. Participatory photography: a tool for empowerment

or surveillance? Act Res. 2010;8:426–443.

[32] Singhal A, Harter LM, Chitnis K, et al. Participatory photog-

raphy as theory, method and praxis: analyzing an entertain-

ment-education project in India. Crit Arts. 2007;21:212–227.

[33] Molloy JK. Photovoice as a tool for social justice workers.

J Prog Hum Serv. 2007;18:39–55.

[34] Wang CC. Photovoice: a participatory action research strat-

egy applied to women’s health. Res J Womens Health.

1999;8:185–192.

[35] Harper D. Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicit-

ation. Visual Studies. 2002;17:13–26.

[36] Collier J. Photography in anthropology: a report on two

experiments. Am Anthropol. 1957;59:843–859.

[37] Clark-Ib?a~nez M. Framing the social world with photo-elicit-

ation interviews. Am Behav Sci. 2004;47:1507–1527.

[38] Phelan S, Kinsella EA. Photoelicitation interview methods

and research with children. In: Higgs J, Titchen A, Horsfall

D, Bridges D, editors. Creative spaces for qualitative

researching: living research. Rotterdam (The Netherlands):

Sense Publishers; 2011. p. 125–134.

[39] Gibson BE, Mistry B, Smith B, et al. The integrated use of

audio diaries, photography, and interviews in research with

disabled young men. Int J Qual Methods. 2013;12:382–402.

[40] Smith EF, Gidlow B, Steel G. Engaging adolescent partici-

pants in academic research: the use of photo-elicitation

interviews to evaluate school-based outdoor education pro-

grammes. Qual Res. 2012;12:367–387.

[41] Whitney JC. My education: students with disabilities

describe high school in pictures and words. TECþ

2006;3:n2.

[42] Burles M, Thomas R. “I Just Don't Think There’s any other

Image that Tells the Story like [This] Picture Does”:

researcher and participant reflections on the use of partici-

pant-employed photography in social research. Int J Qual

Methods. 2014;13:185–205.

[43] Teti M, Cheak-Zamora N, Lolli B, et al. Reframing autism:

young adults with autism share their strengths through

photo-stories. J Pediatr Nurs. 2016;31:619–629.

[44] Cheak-Zamora NC, Teti M, Maurer-Batjer A. Capturing expe-

riences of youth with ASD via photo exploration:

Challenges and resources becoming an adult. J Adolescent

Res. 2018;33:117–145.

[45] Carnahan CR. Photovoice: Engaging children with autism

and their teachers. Teach Escept Child. 2006;39:44–50.

[46] Capewell C. Glue ear–a common but complicated child-

hood condition. JORSEN. 2016;16:122–131.

[47] Nguyen XT, Mitchell C, de Lange N, et al. Engaging girls

with disabilities in Vietnam: making their voices count.

Disabil Soc. 2015;30:773–787.

[48] Danker J, Strnadov?a I, Cumming TM. Engaging students

with autism spectrum disorder in research through partici-

pant-driven photo-elicitation research technique. Australas

J Spec Educ. 2017;41:35–50.

[49] Fereday J, MacDougall C, Spizzo M, et al. “There’s nothing

I can't do–I just put my mind to anything and I can do it”:

a qualitative analysis of how children with chronic diseaseand their parents account for and manage physical activity.

BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:1–16.

[50] Goodwin DL. The meaning of help in PE: Perceptions of

students with physical disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q.

2001;18:289–303.

[51] Lamb P, Firbank D, Aldous D. Capturing the world of

physical education through the eyes of children with

autism spectrum disorders. Sport Educ Soc. 2016;21:

698–722.

[52] Gibson BE, King G, Teachman G, et al. Assembling activity/

setting participation with disabled young people. Sociol

Health Illn. 2017;39:497–512.

[53] Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. The importance of assistive tech-

nology in the productivity pursuits of young adults with

disabilities. Work. 2017;57:455–468.

[54] Cussen A, Howie L, Imms C. Looking to the future: adoles-

cents with cerebral palsy talk about their aspirations-a nar-

rative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2103–2110.

[55] Faircloth SC, Hynds A, Jacob H, et al. Ko wai Au? Who am

I? Examining the multiple identities of M?aori youth. Int J

Qual Stud Educ. 2016;29:359–380.

[56] King G, Gibson BE, Mistry B, et al. An integrated methods

study of the experiences of youth with severe disabilities in

leisure activity settings: the importance of belonging, fun,

and control and choice. Disabil Rehabi. 2014;36:1626–1635.

[57] Bruce BS, Ungar M, Waschbusch DA. Perceptions of risk

among children with and without attention deficit/hyper-

activity disorder. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2009;16:

189–196.

[58] Bell P. Content analysis of visual images. In: van Leeuwen

T, Jewitt C, editors. Handbook of visual analysis. London

(UK): SAGE Publications; 2001. p. 10–35.

[59] Boxall K, Ralph S. Research ethics committees and the ben-

efits of involving people with profound and multiple learn-

ing disabilities in research. Br J Learn Disabil. 2011;

39:173–180.

[60] Cluley V. Using photovoice to include people with pro-

found and multiple learning disabilities in inclusive

research. Br J Learn Disabil. 2017;45:39–46.

[61] Germain R. An exploratory study using cameras and Talking

Mats to access the views of young people with learning

disabilities on their out-of-school activities. Br J Learn

Disabil. 2004;32:170–174.

[62] Dassah E, Aldersey HM, Norman KE. Photovoice and per-

sons with physical disabilities: a scoping review of the

literature. Qual Health Res. 2017; 27:1412–1422.

张喆博士团队成员介绍：金俊亨教授（韩）、李羲京博士（韩）、吴楚仪博士、王瑞博士、秦喆助理研究员、王春甲硕士、郭雨铭硕士、黄尤靖硕士。

张喆简介

张喆博士，中国致公党党员，中国渤海大学心理健康教育硕士生导师，中国照片治疗引进与推广第一人；韩国建阳大学心理咨询硕士；韩国圆光大学艺术治疗学博士。担任职务：韩国又石大学特聘教授，韩国圆光大学特聘咨询专家，韩国照片艺术治疗学会注册督导师(202103051001）。

在国内外发表心理学教育学相关论文10余篇；参与和主持国家级课题2项，省部级课题3项。出版著作6部，心理绘本4部《病毒与小贪》《蝴蝶抱抱》《保护你的勇士》《安全屋》。

截止2021年6月，在大陆24个省份52个城市带领过艺术（照片治疗）疗愈、绘画心理分析与咨询及心理危机干预与生命疗愈工作坊。

工作邮箱：zhangzhe0429@126.com

英文原文